there are certain words that exist in human language which hold immense power and weight. many of these words have existed for centuries in the arena of religion and mythology and are rarely used outside of that context. for example, the word ‘salvation’ will invariably cause one to think of the central foundations of many religions, especially christianity. similar words might include redemption, sacrifice, sin, heaven, hell, eternity, etc. however, each one of these words may be analysed and reflected upon outside of their religious contexts and applied to humanity without presupposition. the concept of ‘hell’ as it relates to a state of torment and suffering is often used in a temporal context to denote the very essence of the concept itself. when we say that something is ‘hellish’ or that someone is having ‘one hell of a time,’ we know exactly what we mean to say. that person or situation is one of frustration, torment, pain and suffering, or tragedy. ‘hell’ is a word-picture used to imply the ultimate expression of the tragic. in the opposite direction, ‘heaven’ is a word-picture we employ to imply the ultimate expression of pleasure and happiness. that is why a simple piece of cheesecake may, very correctly, be described as a ‘thin slice of heaven.’
with that being said, i’d like to examine the word ‘salvation’ in a slightly more objective sense. there are several foundational principles to be unpacked from this concept first. number one: this word, at it’s base level, refers to the act of ‘saving.’
number two: something which needs saving is in a state of ‘doom.’
number three: something in a state of doom is on course to be destroyed.
number four: destruction is the process by which one thing is reduced to nothing.
the process by which one thing is reduced to nothing. well, ironically, that is the natural state of.. well, everything. if you’ve seen the film, ‘fight club,’ you’ll recall the line, ‘on a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.’ this is the inevitable reality (for the present, anyways. the singularitarians might have a different worldview) that everything dies. everything ends. this is one tautological truth i agree with: everything which begins will eventually end.
this fundamental reality presents a problem to beings which are driven and programmed to survive. especially those beings which have words to describe such concepts as death and destruction. it is no surprise that contemplating death and destruction will invariably produce despair. and in retaliation to that despair the mind will seek out a resolution to stem the tide of that despair from consuming the mind. if the problem is inevitable destruction, what other solution is there apart from salvation, in any form?
in this light, it seems the foundational concept of every religion is the proposition which explains how humanity transitions from the state of number three (doomed to destruction) to the state of number one (salvation). in this proposition, humanity (if it chooses to believe) rises above the essential truth of life into a state in which destruction no longer occurs. since this is the most inescapable reality, one would need an awfully powerful force to bring this victory about. the language of warfare, struggle and eventual victory permeates religious culture today. with the dynamic climax of humanity overcoming it’s doomed fate (the de facto reality and what will happen if one does not believe) and acquiring the possession of eternal life (the reward for believing).
lamb of god, who takes away the sins of the world, have mercy on us.
lamb of god, who takes away the sins of the world, grant us peace.
these epic lines illustrate how evolved the aesthetics of salvation are, yet they do not mask the reality of their origins. lamb of god, the all-powerful agent who has the power to save is also, ironically enough, a metaphoric personification of the universe itself. in these two lines it is the universe which is beseeched to grant a stay of execution to us mere mortals, doomed to death. since it is the law of the universe that we should die, clearly it must be the universe which reforms itself and removes the law of death and destruction, essentially granting humanity peace (the resolution of the initial problem which removes the tragedy and despair).
this is not to reduce the nuances and aesthetics of religion to mere psychological projection, but to unravel the extensive evolutionary development of core concepts and language which may or may not have any actual application to human experience.
